Entertainment

Ed Sheeran testifies at copyright trial he'd be 'quite an idiot' to plagiarize Let's Get It On

Under questioning at trial, superstar Ed Sheeran said many pop songs use the same three or four chords, while defending himself from allegations that Thinking Out Loud infringes on the copyright of the 1970s soul classic Let's Get It On.

If Sheeran is found liable for copyright infringement, a second trial phase will determine damages

A man in a suit and tie is shown in closeup in a photograph taken outside a building.
Singer Ed Sheeran departs the Manhattan federal court during his copyright trial in New York City on Tuesday. Sheeran may be called back to the stand later in the trial. (Brendan McDermid/Reuters)

With Ed Sheeran on the witness stand in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday during a copyright trial, jurors were warned to keep their composure while watching a video of the British pop star performing a medley of his hit song Thinking Out Loud and the Marvin Gaye classic Let's Get it On.

"We don't allow dancing," U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton instructed the seven-member jury.

Lawyers for heirs of songwriter Ed Townsend, Gaye's co-writer on the 1973 hit, showed the video to bolster their allegation that Sheeran, his label Warner Music Group and music publisher Sony Music Publishing owe them a share of the profits for allegedly copying the song.

Ben Crump, a lawyer for the heirs, said in his opening statement that the performance amounted to a "confession" by Sheeran.

Under questioning from Keisha Rice, another lawyer for the plaintiffs, Sheeran said many pop songs use the same three or four chords, and that he performs "mash-ups" of many songs at his concerts.

"You could go from Let it Be to No Woman, No Cry and switch back," Sheeran testified, referring to the Beatles and Bob Marley classics. "If I had done what you're accusing me of doing, I'd be quite an idiot to stand on a stage in front of 20,000 people and do that."

The trial is the first of three Sheeran could face from lawsuits over similarities between the two hits.

Chord progression common, defence says

In her opening statement, Sheeran's lawyer, Ilene Farkas, said the two songs are distinct, and told jurors that the plaintiffs should not be allowed to "monopolize" a chord progression used in countless songs.

Sheeran at one point grew frustrated when Rice cut off his response about the medley.

"I feel like you don't want me to answer because you know that what I'm going to say is actually going to make quite a lot of sense," he said.

Sheeran is expected to testify again later in the trial as part of the defence case.

If the jury finds Sheeran liable for copyright infringement, the trial will enter a second phase to determine how much he and his labels owe in damages.

The first trial is expected to last about a week.