Entertainment

Led Zeppelin wins latest battle in Stairway to Heaven legal fight

A U.S. federal appeals court on Monday restored a jury verdict that found Led Zeppelin did not steal Stairway to Heaven.

At issue is comparison of introductory lick to Stairway to Heaven and riff from Taurus

A U.S. federal appeals court on Monday restored a lower court's verdict that found Led Zeppelin did not steal the intro to its classic 1971 rock anthem Stairway to Heaven from the 1968 song Taurus by the band Spirit. (Tim Boyle/Getty Images)

A U.S. federal appeals court on Monday restored a jury verdict that found Led Zeppelin did not steal Stairway to Heaven.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco handed the major win to guitarist Jimmy Page and singer Robert Plant and dealt a blow to the estate of Randy Wolfe of the band Spirit. The estate claimed that the 1971 mega-hit Stairway to Heaven violated the copyright of the 1968 song Taurus.

A majority of an 11-judge panel overturned a previous ruling that the jury in the 2016 trial should have heard the recording of Taurus and was given poor instructions before jurors found in favour of Page and Plant.

The composition of the two songs, not their recordings, were at issue in the case, but the plaintiffs had sought to play the two recordings for jurors as part of their argument that Page had access to the song Taurus as required to prove a copyright violation.

Monday's ruling found that because the jury found that Page did have access to the song that the issue was irrelevant, and playing the recording might have prejudiced the jury to consider more than just the compositions.

"When Page testified, he candidly admitted to owning 'a copy of the album that contains Taurus," the ruling states.

Led Zeppelin singer Robert Plant, left, and guitarist Jimmy Page are shown in a courtroom sketch from a 2016 trial hearing in Los Angeles. (Mona Edwards/Reuters)

The jury found that both Page and Plant 'had access to the musical composition Taurus before Stairway to Heaven was created, it said.

"Once the jury made that finding, the remaining questions on the jury verdict form related to substantial similarity of the works."

Many of the judges were skeptical at the case's hearing in September over the playing of the recording, suggesting that it was a backdoor way for the plaintiffs to get the jury to hear the record.

"You've got to get your sound recording in to win, don't you?" Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz said as he questioned Wolfe estate attorney Francis Malofiy. "You lose the case unless you do. A hundred times out of a hundred."

The 9th Circuit also broke with its own precedent on the question of jury instructions and rejected the so-called "inverse ratio" rule, which held that the more the plaintiffs could prove that an alleged song thief had access to the original material, the lower the standard became for finding the two works similar.

The judge in the trial court did not instruct the jury on the rule. Monday's decision found that he did not need to.

Emails seeking comment from attorneys for both sides were not immediately returned.

At issue is the classic acoustic introductory lick to Stairway to Heaven, constantly played by amateurs in guitar shops for nearly 50 years, and the riff at the centre of the Spirit instrumental Taurus, which follows a similar musical line.

The ruling, which can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, is a potentially precedent-setting win for musical acts accused of plagiarism, and comes in a period when many star songwriters have lost high-profile cases.

Jurors decided in a 2015 trial that Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines copied Marvin Gaye's Got to Give It Up, and a jury last year year found that Katy Perry's hit Dark Horse copied from a Christian rap song.