Ford government used MZOs 17 times more than previous 20 years in Ontario: AG report
Auditor General says process of issuing ministerial zoning orders needs an overhaul
Ontario's ministerial zoning order process needs to be overhauled, even after the introduction of a new framework for the land use planning tool, the province's auditor general said Tuesday.
Minister's zoning orders — also known as MZOs — allow the housing minister to make changes to land zoning rules, override municipal decisions, and in theory, fast-track housing projects.
The auditor general says the province has used the tool 114 times from 2019 to 2023 under Premier Doug Ford's government, which is a 17-fold increase in usage from the previous 20 years.
Consequently, re-zoned agricultural land rose in value by 46 per cent on average, the auditor general concluded.
"We found that none of the information packages that the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing prepared for the minister during this time contained an assessment as to whether the MZO was necessary, including if it would expedite the project, as opposed to using the normal municipal planning process," auditor general Shelley Spence said at a news conference.
The audit also found the minister's office "instructed that some requests be assessed and provided to the minister by ad hoc, tight deadlines."
The auditor general's annual report highlighted several issues with some MZOs that have been granted.
AG issued 19 recommendations
In late 2021, for example, the Township of Cavan Monaghan passed a resolution to support an MZO for a massive project called Kawartha Downs that included a horse racing track, a casino and residential housing.
The township's mayor emailed then-housing minister Steve Clark's deputy chief of staff directly, who then passed the request on to the ministry.
The developer told the ministry, the township and the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority that an important wetland in that areawould not be touched. The ministry began discussions with the Williams Treaties First Nations and told them the wetland would be protected.
A consultant working for the developer then requested that parts of the wetland be included in the project because protecting them would have resulted in complaints for development," the auditor general wrote.
Neither the First Nations nor the conservation authority were told or consulted, the auditor said, and Clark approved the MZO two days later.
The auditor general issued 19 recommendations that include assessing and documenting the rationale for taking a project through the MZO process or sticking with the municipal planning process.
Ministry has accepted recommendations
Housing Minister Paul Calandra introduced a new framework in April for granting the zoning orders, which addresses some of the auditor general's recommendations.
The ministry has accepted all of the recommendations.
"I think a vast majority of the recommendations we've already implemented with the new MZO framework," Calandra said.
"Absolutely we want to ensure that the ultimate goal is to get a shovel in the ground. Then we are going to ensure that any MZO that we approve has to be followed up by a shovel in the ground. If it's not, then I won't hesitate to revoke it."
Calandra said he has revoked three MZOs since introducing the new framework and has placed a number of others on a "watch list."
Liberal parliamentary leader John Fraser drew similarities between the audit and the province's Greenbelt land swap scandal, the subject of a special report Spence's predecessor issued last year.
Then-auditor general Bonnie Lysyk found some developers got preferential treatment from Clark's chief of staff. Those developers stood to see their land value rise by $8.3 billion once the land was removed from the protected Greenbelt, she found.
That revelation, along with a similarly scathing report from the province's integrity commissioner, sparked a series of departures, including Clark's resignation as housing minister.
"On the MZOs, it's Groundhog Day, it's like Greenbelt 2.0," Fraser said.
"It's very clear that the government doesn't listen to local governments and puts the interests of land speculators ahead of local governments and ahead of the people."